archive
archive
archive
archive
archive
archive
archive
archive
archive
archive
archive
archive
archive
archive
archive
archive
archive
archive
archive
killer
  • 31268.1237

    mentioned as a Nice Publication for March in Creative Review "the best in visual communication" here's IPad size selections. Drawn by Jack Forbes.

  • 31268.1100

    Ridley Scott, whose sophomore-try Alien and junior-stretch Blade Runner are distinctly adventurous masterpieces, almost returned to sci-fi with John Logan's version of I Am Legend. With a budget nearing $200 million, the film was scuttled and we know the end result. A Will Smith vehicle. We all had to at least watch it once.

    http://www.horrorlair.com/scripts/IAmLegend.txt

  • 31267.0810

    The Matrix, a self-reflective progeny no less alert than Lucas' first Star Wars, was culled from equal parts THX-1138 and Tron. Both films (Tron and THX) shared unique cybernetic ratios of digital journeys far before the dominance of the PC and are brilliantly contrasted in chroma styles, hues, dialogue nuances and physicality versus 'virtual' or software avatar'd beings. What they shared was more crucial, both failed to make their budgets back, both posed anonymous guards with long poles, both involved escaping speeding bikes, and pivotally, both films lack a coherent and sustained crescendo. Flynn merely did what Neo does, he jumps without fear, but with little build-up to get an audience to root. Tron is the almost-masterpiece, and is perhaps the most informed animated film of the 80's. Lisberger and company take the Disney tower hostage for a late summer in 1982 and alter the rules by cutting away before morphs and tweens finish, pretending as if these glistening lights in transition are normal everyday happenings, subtley they advanced the craft of the virtually exotic.  Now forced to eat its own children (The Matrixes) made at other studios (Warner Bros), Disney has crafted the Tron reboot as a 'legacy' film with falsely iconic hacker Flynn and child now dealing with a more complex INNER. The strains of adding credibility shows in Legacy's design choices, what was hallucinatory as digital is now solid, credible. As a film forced to compete somewhat with its spawn, Legacy now has to make note of The Matrix's possibilities, and since the rules in Tron:Legacy cannot change: it's much easier to suggest them visually (note the furniture overlapping). Tron's Bally-Midway arcade game outgrossed the film 10:1.

    below, taking it too literally, too early: tron: LEG-acy

  • 31265.1002

    http://ask.metafilter.com/111950/Is-my-husband-trying-to-kill-me

     

    "About a month ago I could have potentially died from carbon monoxide poising. My husband usually leaves for work before I do. We live in a small single level home and the master bedroom is very close to the attached garage. This particular morning he pulled his car out of the garage to warm it up. As he was getting ready to leave he grabbed some cash from my purse as he went out the front door and must have hit the autostart on my keychain which started my car. The door to the garage from the house was open (which was not uncommon since if it didn't latch all the way it opens). About a half hour after he left I had just gotten out of the shower and thought I smelled exhaust. I went to the garage door and to my horror saw the car running. I immediately called my husband and he told me to open all the windows, go sit right at one of the
    windows and he'd be right home (he was very comforting and always seems to handle problems so well). He came home and we figured out what must have happened. I felt ok so we didn't go to the hospital."

  • 31260.2307

  • 31257.0406

  • 31256.1807

    The nearer edge of the subjective cuts across and includes part of our present time, viz. the moment of inception, but most of our present belongs in the Hopi scheme to the objective realm and so is indistinguishable from our past. There is also a verb form, the INCEPTIVE which refers to this EDGE of emergent manifestation in the reverse way-as belonging to the objective, at the edge at which objectivity is obtained; this is used to indicate beginning/starting, and in most cases there is no difference apparent in the translation from the similar use of the expective. But, at certain crucial points, significant and fundamental differences appear. The inceptive, referring to the objective and the result side, and not like the expective to the subjective and causal side, implies the ending of the work of causation in the same breath that it states the beginning of manifestation.
    - BENJAMIN LEE WHORF AN AMERICAN INDIAN MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE

  • 31254.0811

    Juiced with primal parts of Kubrick and Lynch (and Hitchcock, Val Lewton, Siodmak, Lang et al), Scorsese's Shutter Island makes a dry run for DiCaprio's Teddy Daniel's consciousness and hits paydirt for about an hour before the opera its hiding takes control. In a way, every film fools an audience, so the gimmick in films like Shutter of fooling them twice only works once.  Getting to play with the ripest paranoia of the 20th Century, Scorsese splits a mean, fearful ex-G.I. now Federal Marshall right in half and sends one of him in after a missing person's report is filed on Shutter Island, a unique, specialized hospital for the criminally insane. A prisoner/patient who vanished into thin air is the lure, and of course the case turns out has not one but two missing persons, both stemming from the same, hidden, central conflict. Recombinant backstory. Kind of a reverse "I Married a Communist", Scorsese spends most of his time orchestrating loaded and coded anguish that moves both forwards and backwards, through reality and through dream fantasy. Hell, the film is enough of a wild card that the island might not even be real (can you see water from Ward C, didn't his kids drown in water?). The anguish comes complete with walkway crosses and distorted spiral staircases that seem to repeat (there are some connecting, enticing visuals throughout).  By following the flames of the initial 'crime' in a vision, we get to watch the central metaphor find its way home, it migrates from housefire to campfire and through two sets of fantasy masquerading as fanatacism. Where there's fire there's...By following the smoke, and the film opens in a dense fog (see above) we get to see which way things are really going, at a pivotal moment he shows us the smoke moving backwards (a la the flames in Lost Highway) and we know two pasts are merging without Teddy's control. The strange thing, the fire smoke and blood don't really meet in the central gotcha nightmare at the end, so we're left to wonder if Scorsese even understood the film he was making. Certain monologues are transmitted with a haze that vanishes when the timing is necessary (see: Kingsley's second to last speechifying). The embrace, the pivotal soul-shank of The Shining, is mirrored here, and by mirroring this and a few other gestures, it gets diffuse pretty quickly (even actors get to play dual characters), but there is no fun in the embrace, or the mirrors, no lure. Poe would and did have more fun shrieking with the unconscious past-future, and strangely, so did Scorsese's heirs, you wonder why it's all not really exciting then you realize Ben Kingsley is a terrible stand in for Vincent Price or Walter Pidgeon, he can't play both halves of a villain so he varies between good and evil. The crime being committed by the filmmakers is their lack of gestation improv with POV's. You can tell without reading the book Scorsese and his writers are taking Lehane seriously, and literally, and don't improvise other doorways the novel didn't try, they just condense it and add a few red herrings. Invoking The Shining is a cheapshot since that film was about altering every aspect of its source material. Kubrick made a full conversion to film, he made a film that defies the novel's medium. By separating 'fantasy' from fantasy, Scorsese and team stick to rules that keep their overall structure logical to a tee. They don't go deeper than the book and there's the rub, to make a masterpiece from pulp you have to transform it and none of that is occuring here. Had Kingsley or Sydow reappeared as inmates, or his wife as a well disguised suspect or patient, the film might never have to drift into Teddy's 'dreams': then Scorsese would have upped the ante and the possibilites. He would have to present apparent reality more vigorously. Since the veracity of most of the truth is up for grabs anyway, why not really send the audience home amazed, shocked at Teddy's inner distortions as opposed to his 'troubled visions' that veer towards music video interludes or drawn from fugue states in other, better films. And Scorsese's females, as usual afterthoughts at best, are constricted wooden pieces here, their pain veers from overwrought to mechanical (since they are reading from 'scripts'), here's where Kubrick always scored, since he knew how to record his actresses' unconscious, Scorsese expects these actresses to deliver 'the method' in five takes but they're unsure how to play it. Michelle Williams can't raise her performance above a high school musical since her task is insurmountable, she's literally on her own in those memories, Scorsese doesn't craft subtle alternates, he's more comfortable with jump-cutting (a Scorsese rarity) than with distortions in revelations (a Scorsese never).  Since Teddy is essentially searching for himself, we get only fleeting glances of the mayhem penetrating 'reality' (early on motions are distorted, there seem to be subtle continuity errors, even in backgrounds) and these should have remained the fullest experience in distortion. The graphic sensibilities at times are right on target; as Teddy tours the head-shrink's office and spots an engraving with a mental patient, his head strapped to a blinder box with an arched doorway shape as the view-portal, Teddy seems to know the box is in effect. It is. Watch the archway grace the film endlessly. Ward C's central courtyard is a redo of D.C.'s rotunda only darkened into near invisibility (check the panels) and pulled into darkness from the engraving's slit. It's too bad the overall layout of the island is strictly videogame-lame, Ward C feels lobbed onto the film's exceptional campus symmetry, it's just the nightmare added to the enlightenment's revival urban planning. It looks sloppily conventional. And the chain-link patterns, reused endlessly too, are more of a giveaway, the question becomes where (what ward) does Teddy experience this all from? Even lamer is the faux drama of the staginess, we know looking back how weird it all looked because we know who Teddy is, or who he thinks he is. The problem with Shutter Island is there is no villain, it's not really that fun (and it could have been) the cat and mouse is purely didactic, we're led to the shocking finality staged as a pastoral fantasy, and it rings hollow since it can only be as staged as Minority Report's fantasy island ending. He wants us to think it's real but the lingering doubt is necessary and a component to Scorsese's near stoicism. Something feels flatly cynical in all these mindgames. And that's where the film dies, it doesn't make the ending real at all, Scorsese stages the lake scene in overdone technicolor, like a Sirk or an Anthony Mann film, but the choice makes no sense anymore. Is he claiming Teddy's guilty either way because his 'memory' romanticizes his nightmarish discovery and subsequent revenge?  He can't possibly believe Teddy is the villain but DiCaprio is rapidly exposed and left in the archetype, he's the one that could be visiting his wife here but instead he's here: the guilty replacing the guilty. The film's gotcha ending is the letdown and it converts any villain, even the island itself, into a wildcard.  A film made for psychiatrists by psychiatrists that ends up worshipping them and their art (talk about a  code-sharing with directors). The same paranoia that suffused and ended The Aviator ends it here needlessly, since we assume that Teddy knows who he is and is in the end, just faking it now, and it's incomplete enough to have Chuck call him Teddy before the needle is shown. Scorsese wants to leave the audience guessing but it's the cheapest shot of all: The staff know him much better as Teddy. Next stage for Leo is the similarly dreamworld caper Inception. Let's hope Nolan doesn't botch it as badly as this.

  • 31248.2334

    Steve Jobs to WSJ: ditch "dying" Flash technology

    On a recent trip to New York to woo newspaper publishers with demonstrations of the iPad, Steve Jobs met with staff at the Wall Street Journal. During the demo, editors asked about the iPad's lack of Flash support, to which Jobs replied, "We don't spend a lot of energy on old technology."

    According to sources speaking to Valleywag, Jobs repeated the comments he made during a recent town hall meeting among Apple employees shortly after last month's introduction of the iPad. He reportedly told WSJ staff that Flash is buggy and crashes Macs, is a "CPU hog," and a source of "security holes." He also referred to Flash as dying technology, likening not supporting Flash on the iPad to Apple dropping support for floppy drives, ditching legacy data ports, and replacing CCFL backlighting with LEDs.

    Adobe has made efforts to address the concerns about performance on Mac OS X, noting that Flash 10.1 should offer significant improvements (an area we are investigating further). That isn't likely to sway Apple, though, as Jobs recommending replacing Flash-based content with H.264 video, JavaScript, and other techniques. Such a move is doable, if not entirely "trivial" as Jobs suggested.

  • 31248.1911

    "Alterations in the Game had a major impact on the functioning of the entire commune. Although it is true that in many ways the Game's brutal honesty upheld for a long time the highest standards of morality, when it became difficult for members to disagree with Chuck Dederich and other leaders in game formats a significant part of Synanon's system of checks and balances was lost."